首页> 外文OA文献 >The Audible Pop from Thoracic Spine Thrust Manipulation and Its Relation to Short-Term Outcomes in Patients with Neck Pain
【2h】

The Audible Pop from Thoracic Spine Thrust Manipulation and Its Relation to Short-Term Outcomes in Patients with Neck Pain

机译:颈椎病患者胸椎推力声响及其与短期预后的关系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Clinicians routinely consider the success of a thrust manipulation technique based on the presence or absence of an audible pop despite the lack of evidence suggesting that this pop is associated with improved outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the number of audible pops with thoracic spinal manipulation and improvement in pain and function in patients with mechanical neck pain. In this prospective cohort study, 78 patients referred to physical therapy with mechanical neck pain underwent a standardized examination and thoracic spine manipulation treatment protocol. All patients were treated with a total of 6 thrust manipulation techniques directed to the thoracic spine followed by a basic cervical range of motion exercise. The treating clinician recorded the presence or absence of a pop during each manipulation. Outcomes were assessed at a 2–4 day follow-up with an 11-point numeric pain rating (NPRS), the Neck Disability Index, the patient Global Rating of Change (GROC), and measurements of cervical range of motion (CROM). The relationship between the number of pops and change scores for pain, disability, and CROM was first examined using Pearson correlation coefficients. Individuals were then categorized as having received ≤3 or >3 pops. Repeated measures analyses of variance were used to examine whether achievement of >3 pops resulted in improved outcome. Seventy-eight patients with a mean age of 42 (SD 11.3) years participated in the study. Pearson correlation coefficients revealed no significant correlation existed between the number of pops and outcomes with the exception of 3 of the 6 CROM measurements, which were inversely related. There was no significant interaction for group X time for any of the dependent measures (P>0.05). The odds ratio for patients experiencing dramatic improvement was in favor of the group experiencing ≤3 pops but this was not clinically meaningful (1.3: 95% CI 0.46, 3.7). The results of this analysis provide preliminary evidence for the hypothesis that there is no relationship between the number of audible pops during thoracic spine thrust manipulation and clinically meaningful improvements in pain, disability, or CROM in patients with mechanical neck pain. Additionally, a greater number of audible pops experienced was not associated with a dramatic improvement with manipulation treatment.
机译:尽管缺乏证据表明该爆裂声与改善的结局相关,但临床医生通常会根据是否存在可听的爆裂声来考虑推力操纵技术的成功。这项研究的目的是确定机械性颈痛患者的可闻pop啪声与胸部脊柱操纵与疼痛和功能改善之间的关系。在这项前瞻性队列研究中,有78位转介机械性颈痛的物理疗法患者接受了标准化检查和胸椎操纵治疗方案。所有患者均接受了六种针对胸椎的推力操纵技术,随后进行了基本的颈椎运动训练。主治医生记录每次操作过程中是否存在爆裂声。在2-4天的随访中评估结果,评估结果为11点数字疼痛评分(NPRS),颈部残疾指数,患者总体变化评分(GROC)和颈椎活动范围测量(CROM)。首先使用Pearson相关系数检查爆裂次数与疼痛,残疾和CROM的变化评分之间的关​​系。然后将个人归类为已收到≤3或> 3的流行音乐。重复测量方差分析可检查是否实现了大于3的爆破音,从而改善了结局。平均年龄为42岁(SD 11.3)的78位患者参加了该研究。皮尔逊相关系数显示,除了6个CROM测量值中的3个呈负相关之外,爆裂次数与结果之间不存在显着相关性。 X组时间的任何相关测量均无显着交互作用(P> 0.05)。经历显着改善的患者的优势比支持≤3的人群,但这在临床上没有意义(1.3:95%CI 0.46,3.7)。该分析的结果为以下假设提供了初步证据:在机械性颈痛患者中,胸椎推力操纵过程中可听见的爆裂声数量与疼痛,残疾或CROM在临床上有意义的改善之间没有关系。另外,更多的听得见的爆裂声与操纵治疗的显着改善无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号